Green Book

Green Book (Peter Farrelly, 2018) 4/5

What is at the crux of this film, is a culmination of a variety of different films that deal gb posterwith the civil rights movement, the generic conventions of the buddy movie and grappling with a specific social context. Subverting the gender and race dimensions of Driving Miss Daisy (Bruce Beresford, 1989), this film follows New York bouncer Frank “Tony Lip” Vallelonga (Viggo Mortensen) who, searching for new employment gets invited to interview for the role of driver for Doc Don Shirley (Mahershala Ali). After deliberations, and, an interesting first encounter, Tony gets the job and must drive Doc across the deep south on his tour.

This film marks a significant departure for Farrelly, whose fare usually includes gross out comedy such as the likes of There’s Something About Mary (1998) and Shallow Hal (2001). There are, of course, some clear comedic moments and most of these form the basis of the relationship between the two men. However, as the narrative delves deeper into the personal troubles of both men and also the social context of the Jim Crow Laws in 1960’s America, this is where the films strengths are.

Now, let’s not get it twisted. Green Book is not a film to reinvent the wheel in terms of these types of films and there are definite classical Hollywood traits here. However, the performances of both Ali and Mortensen elevate the screenplay and inject such passion into their roles that makes this film an Oscar contender.

In sum, Green Book has all of the qualities of The Help, Hidden Figures, Driving Miss Daisy and many others that aid in its likeability. However, what sets this a part is its timeliness in regards to current race relations in the US as well as the charismatic performances of both of the male leads.

Advertisements

BlacKkKlansman

BlacKkKlansman (Spike Lee, 2018) 4/5

Spike Lee’s return to the centre stage of film is definitely a timely addition to his alreadybk provocative cannon. The narrative follows the true story of Ron Stallworth (John David Washington), the first black police officer in the Colorado Springs Police Department. As Ron becomes somewhat of a novelty in regards to his race, he is given the grunt jobs of filing reports and, generally, trying to survive on the bottom of the food chain. This quiet existence in the force is disrupted by racism in the office and a general ambivalence, he decides to take the initiative to become an undercover agent.

Leading to a somewhat awkward telephone conversation with the local head of KKK chapter, he and his partner Philip ‘Flip’ Zimmerman (Adam Driver) must act together to infiltrate them to expose their terroristic tendencies. Flip serves as the face to face contact and Ron, controlling all of the discussions over the phone. Their investigations unravel the cities racist undercurrents and explores the tensions that exist.

Generally speaking, this film is shocking not only because of the rhetoric of some of its characters, but the parallels with the current Trump administrations divisive attitude.  Lee crafts a film that forces the audience to continually negotiate and compare both time periods and ask ourselves, ‘what has actually changed?’

This is done to great effect with the editing by Barry Brown (Oldboy, Inside Man, Malcolm X) and the cinematography by Chayse Irvin (Beyonce’s Lemonade). Both men create a world whereby we are wrapped into the characters, their experiences and points of view. The parallels to the Blaxploitation films of the 1970’s has clearly influenced this film and it aids in the slightly exaggerated sequences of both dramatic tension and comedy.

There are moments, however, that this tightrope walk between the comedy and drama becomes a little uneven, plus, some of the most tense moments are bogged down with long monologues that could be made just a tad shorter.

In sum, the performances by Driver and Washington are outstanding here and are worthy of the awards attention they will no doubt receive. However, there are tonal imbalances here that might prove a bit odd to some people, as well as, the fact that the narrative could just have been a smidgen shorter.

Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again

Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again (Ol Parker, 2018) 4/5

Hold on to your hats boys and girls, because, yes, you’ve guessed it, here we go again! Mamma-Mia-2-New-Film-Poster-2018Benny and Bjorn have got the entire team back again to sing all of the greatest Abba anthems once again, this time with one big difference, Meryl Streep is severely lacking (spoilers ahead).

Part sequel and prequel, this second film in the franchise outlines the story of how Donna comes to her idyllic Greek Island and falls for the three handsome men that would turn out to be Sophie’s dads. Unfortunately for Donna (and the rest of the audience), she’s dead. As such, the contemporary storyline is largely missing Streep, however, that doesn’t stop the camp being turned up to 11. Lily James is a fantastic addition to the case as the young Donna and belts out ‘When I kissed a Teacher’, ‘Andante Andante’ and, the classic wedding dancefloor filler, ‘Waterloo’. James proves to be every bit capable of carrying this film and it is this that makes the story so worthwhile and without her, it would have been poorer.

In essence, this film brings everything that we loved about the first film and added just about every feather boa and flared jean you could ever imagine. Ol Parker (The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel) knows how to make these types of films, and the cast are clearly having a ball. Standouts though include Christine Baranski, Colin Firth, Pierce Brosnan and, of course, CHER.  The iconic diva might be in a total of 23 seconds of the story (I might be being dramatic there.) but her presence is all kinds of fabulous and she can still belt out a tune.

The only thing that would have made this experience much better would have been to know exactly what caused Donna’s demise. Without this, we are left hanging slightly, thinking, did she die on a Greek fishing accident?

In sum, Mamma Mia: Here We Go Again! Is probably the most fun you will have in a cinema this year. A word of caution though, if you are a fan of Streep, she will be in even less of this film than Cher.

The Greatest Showman

The Greatest Showman (Michael Gracey, 2017) 4/5

Contemporary musicals are essentially the rarest of filmic breeds. They are either reboots of older classics or adaptations of great stage productions from around the world. What is more common is when these are fused with popular historic figures and this fusion works well when that person was linked with show business. Michael Gracey’s directorial debut is a show stopping adventure through tposter-largehe weird and wonderful eyes of P.T Barnum and his eclectic mix of performers.

Scepticism did almost overtake me prior to watching this Hugh Jackman star vehicle, but I persisted, and I’m very glad that I did. From the cinematography, acting, editing, and performances everything here works so well that it is seamless in the action. Jackman is no stranger to the spotlight of the stage and thrives her as the protagonist as through dance numbers, all of his skills as a performer are brought out in full force. He carries this movie with aplomb (I love that word!) and bringing Zac Efron onboard to entice a younger crowd (clever marketing), plus throwing the added class of Michelle Williams adds another dimension to this already celebrated canon.

In essence, this film is about inclusivity and diversity, which is a little more than topical at the moment in time. I won’t go into that too much (*ahem* Trump, *ahem* Harvey Weinstein) and the songs show a very strong reflection of this zeitgeist. Fox made a very clever hire of Pasek and Paul, who are fresh off their win for the – dare I say it, slightly dull – La La Land at last years Oscars. Their songs are simply infectious and you will be singing all of the way home. Of course, it does help that the screenplay is also written by Jenny Bicks (Sex and the City vet) and Bill Condon (Dreamgirls and Chicago).

Of course, it can be very difficult to balance the gritty reality of the actual figure and the glitz of movie musical. Sure, some bits are glossed over with glitter, but this movie is all about escapism. If you’d like a more pronounced musical biopic, I’d direct you to ‘Walk the Line’ for example.

There are shades of Baz Luhrmann here too and Moulin Rouge is clearly something they wanted to emulate, not just with the rooftop dancing, but also with it’s feverish pace and fast editing.

In sum, whilst The Greatest Showman might lean a little too much on the ‘show’ aspects and not on the murkier sides of Barnum. This movie is an escapists dream with a very powerful message of inclusion in a time where not everybody is getting the representation or safety they deserve.

Star Wars: The Last Jedi

Star wars: The Last Jedi (Rian Johnson, 2017) 4/5

The middle film in a trilogy can always seen like a place card holder from the first and the last adventure. Star wars has traditionally been able to avoid this with each film in it’s canon exhibiting it’s own individual story, whilst successfully adding a new narrative to the overall structure. The Last Jedi continues in this vein, as Rian Johnson’s follow-up to the fantastic The Force Awakens allows both new and old fans of the franchise to experience the spectacle of this space opera.Star_Wars_The_Last_Jedi

In a sense, narrative wise, this film is a lot paired back than the previous film and gives the audience a lot more interaction with older characters. Most notably Luke Skywalker and Princess Leia, whose individual story arcs are really what holds everything together here. It’s just so rewarding to see Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher (May she Rest in Peace) interact and further instil their acting chops!

Following directly where the last film left off, The First Order are continuing their attack on the resistance, causing mighty havoc in the process. As you can imagine, there are some mighty good fight sequences here and the special effects are amazing. However, it is Johnson’s screenplay that really enables the adventure to keep at fast enough pace to forgive the rather long 150 minute screen time.

I guess what is so fascinating about this new trilogy of films is how Disney has approached them. Everything seems to be meticulous so as to welcome a younger fan base, whilst at the same time, not ostracising the audience of the previous films. The Last Jedi walks this tightrope successfully and there are enough references to the past narratives, as well as, new character additions to enthral the younger – Disney-fied – crowd.

In sum, Rian Johnsons middle film in this trilogy is successful in terms of storytelling, action, acting and special effects. It never feels lumbered and is fast paced for it’s running time. Overall, it doesn’t quite live up to the magic of The Force Awakens, however it is a very good addition to the cannon and sets up for the action packed finale.

Paddington 2

Paddington (Paul King, 2017) 2.5/5

With a property like Paddington the Bear, it’s not unfeasible that after the success of the 9x16-Hat-Tip_V1_Paddington-2first film, there would be more on the way. The magic of the first film from its careful introduction of key characters, the merging of 21st Century society and key landmarks of contemporary London made for an exceptional family film. The sequel here tries to emulate this with some handy cameo’s, however it never really reaches the heady heights of it’s predecessor.

The story here follows our lovely bear getting all caught up with the law and arrested for stealing a pop up book in the heart of Portobello Road. Whilst in prison he meets some colourful prisoners headed by the great Brendan Gleeson as ‘Knuckles McGinty’ the prison chef. Stepping into Nicole Kidman’s shoes for the role of villain here is Hugh Grant who portrays fallen actor ‘Phoenix Buchanan’ who is using the book to romp across London to discover untold treasure.

Unfortunately, instead of being sinister, Grant is a tad annoying here. With Kidman, she was more restrained in her delivery. Whereas here, we have a more panto like figure with not much substance. Also, the ‘twee-ness’ of the first film added to the charm, whilst here it almost suffocates everything and everyone at every turn. Although, this being said, the animation in parts of this film is spectacular and really adds to the roots of this character.

However, everything just seems to be really rushed here, the inclusion of more neighbours doesn’t help. Sanjeev Bhaskar, Ben Miller and Jessica Hynes are squished into probably about 10 mins of screen time and add very little. By supersizing recognisable faces, we lose our main character altogether. Of course, Paddington will always be likeable and Ben Whishaw is still on top form portraying his earnestness and exuding charm in the process.

In sum, Paddington 2 is still a charming adventure, however it just doesn’t have the streamlined appeal of the first film. It seems the bear has become a little bit bloated from eating all of that marmalade…

Justice League

Justice League (Zack Snyder, 2017) 3/5

DC has an issue with hype versus reality. The hype surrounding this film was that it Justice_League_film_posterwould finally bring some fresh life to the franchise and ignite some enthusiasm with the help of some extra superheroes. The issue though, is that it all seems a tad undernourished. Think of this film as a Rubik’s Cube, at points it is all in sync, while at others it all seems to be flapping in the wind. Batman, Wonder Woman, Cyborg, The Flash and Aquaman team together to defeat Steppenwolf, who thousands of years ago attempted to destroy Earth with the help of his army of Parademons and three Mother Boxes. However, he was defeated and, guess what, is back and is not a happy camper. Round two for Steppenwolf.

As a premise this is actually quite an exciting set up, however the actual story from that doesn’t really develop. Instead there is a lot, and I mean a lot, of time introducing the whole team. In turn, The Flash, Aquaman and Cyborg are given airtime and to have their piece of backstory highlighted. This plodded along a bit and slowed the pace considerably. What DC should have done was to hold fire on this film until we had the first film of each of these guys released. That way, we would have known all about them before they teamed up. As such, for a good hour (the film only runs for 120 mins in total) there seems to be a lot of filler that could have been done in a post-credit sequence. As such, what you have is a rushed experience in the second half that tries to tie everything up in a neat bow.

What is actually quite good here is the interaction between the team and the more light-hearted tone. There is good banter between everyone and this makes for enjoyable viewing (please take note for Suicide Squad 2, for the love of god!). As well as this, the fight sequences are well orchestrated, and the special effects is top notch. However, sometimes you can have too much of a good thing. Steppenwolf looks so unreal in this that it was slightly laughable and made you wonder if this was a glimpse into the new console game that they are developing. He was played by a really talented actor in Ciaran Hinds, but you wouldn’t of know it under all of that gloop.

Gal Gadot and Ezra Miller are the shining lights here as they offer much needed charisma to the overall bleak picture and give the team some uplift as opposed to the brooding testosterone of Ben Affleck, Jason Mamoa and Henry Cavill’s Superman (yes, he’s back!).

In sum, the Justice League is a nice addition to the DC canon, however it could have been a great one. There has been some missteps here, but it wasn’t a bad adventure to begin with. I guess the main problem – apart from Wonder Woman – is, will fans keep holding their breath for an excellent film for too much longer?